PDA

View Full Version : 7 ABC affiliates ordered not to air 'Nightline'


Wrath
April 30th, 2004, 08:13
Order draws sharp response from network and angry calls
Thursday, April 29, 2004 Posted: 11:37 PM EDT (0337 GMT)

(CNN) -- Sinclair Broadcast Group has ordered its seven ABC stations not to broadcast Friday's "Nightline" that will air the names and photographs of the more than 500 U.S. troops killed in the Iraq war.

In a statement online, the Sinclair group said the "Nightline" program "appears to be motivated by a political agenda designed to undermine the efforts of the United States in Iraq."

Sinclair's decision, announced Thursday, drew angry calls from the public and a sharp response from ABC News.

"We respectfully disagree with Sinclair's decision to pre-empt 'Nightline's' tribute to America's fallen soldiers," ABC News said in a statement. "The 'Nightline' broadcast is an expression of respect which simply seeks to honor those who have laid down their lives for this country."

Some of the stations have received many calls and e-mails in response to Sinclair's decision.

"I have not gotten one positive response," said an assignment desk editor at WSYX, the ABC station in Columbus, Ohio.

WEAR in Pensacola, Florida, has been inundated with phone calls and e-mails. A man who answered the phone in the station's newsroom said people mostly wanted to know why the decision was made.

On the Web site for WLOS in Asheville, North Carolina, the station invited viewers to e-mail the station and said it would forward the messages to Sinclair.

The company's other ABC stations are in St. Louis, Missouri; Charleston, West Virginia; Winston-Salem, North Carolina and Springfield, Massachusetts.

The show, titled "The Fallen," will air at 11:35 p.m. Friday. In it, newsman Ted Koppel will read the names of the U.S. troops killed in action while their pictures are shown to viewers.

As of Thursday, 533 U.S. troops have been killed in action in the Iraq war; another 204 troops have died from nonhostile incidents.

Sinclair general counsel Barry Faber confirmed the company told its ABC affiliates not to air Friday's Nightline.

"We find it to be contrary to public interest," he said.

ABC said that on the first anniversary of the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks it aired the names and pictures of all those who died on that day.

"ABC News will continue to report on all facets of the war in Iraq and the war on terrorism in a manner consistent with the standards which ABC News has set for decades," it said.

Sinclair's statement said ABC is politicizing the war.

"Mr. Koppel and 'Nightline' are hiding behind this so-called tribute in an effort to highlight only one aspect of the war effort and in doing so to influence public opinion against the military action in Iraq," the statement said.

According to campaign finance records, four of Sinclair's top executives each have given the maximum campaign contribution of $2,000 to the Bush-Cheney re-election campaign.

The executives have not given any donations to the campaign of Sen. John Kerry, the presumptive Democratic nominee, the records showed.

Sinclair owns and operates, programs, or provides sales services to 62 stations in 39 markets, according to its Web site.

In addition its ABC outlets, Sinclair's television group includes 20 Fox, 19 WB, six UPN, three CBS and four NBC affiliates, and two independent stations.

It reaches approximately 24 percent of all U.S. television households, according to the Web site.

ABC News will show the tribute live on its large television screen in New York's Times Square.

http://www.cnn.com/2004/SHOWBIZ/TV/04/29/abc.nightline/index.html

Seawolf
April 30th, 2004, 08:24
I fail to see how reading names is at all newsworthy. Sounds like like a lame attempt to exploit the deaths of brave american servicemen and women to promote a liberal anti-war agenda.

Wrath
April 30th, 2004, 08:43
Shouldn't those brave american soldiers get some sort of recognition and allow the american public to look at their faces and see who these good people were? They gave their lives for their country. The public should be able to see who they were as opposed to them being just an anonymous number. They were brave men and women and should be treated with respect and I don't feel that showing their faces and giving their names is disrespectful.

kinggovernor
April 30th, 2004, 08:43
i see nothing political with this, i dont believe that its the right way to honor dead servicemembers. if someone is trying to use this for political gain, that is outright disgusting

Seawolf
April 30th, 2004, 08:45
Shouldn't those brave american soldiers get some sort of recognition and allow the american public to look at their faces and see who these good people were? They gave their lives for their country. The public should be able to see who they were as opposed to them being just an anonymous number. They were brave men and women and should be treated with respect and I don't feel that showing their faces and giving their names is disrespectful.
Every time someone gets a bee sting in Iraq, there's a FOX NEWS ALERT all about it for 3 hours with military analysts and reporters interviewing family and friends and all this shit.

Any time a soldier from Connecticut dies, all the local TV stations do like a week long expose on their family, their life, everything. It's the top fucking story on the news for a whole week.

Wrath
April 30th, 2004, 08:51
We don't see that here in Canada. We only get the main ABC, NBC, CBS etc and we don't get FoxNews. We only hear that "10 servicemen were killed in Baghdad today as they drove past a roadside bomb that exploded. Several bystanders were killed and injured as well" and then they move on to the next story.

When Canadian servicemen are killed we see the bodies arrive in Canada and carried off the planes draped in our flag etc. We, all across the country, know who they are and what they look like. We know as we look at their faces that those people volunteered to go and risk their lives to contribute and died doing it.

Lonewolf
April 30th, 2004, 09:02
Actually this is one time I have to agree with Wrath. I don't see this as a political ploy as they did the same thing for those that passed in the trade centers.

I do think it's sad that a news show would be edited by the owners of the stations because he doesn't agree with it. What ever happened to freedom of speach? We don't have to like what is said but we have no right to stop it from being said. We can always turn our own channels. I don't need some suit to do it for me.

Seawolf
April 30th, 2004, 09:12
That "suit" owns the channel. They can do whatever they want.

Dogg
April 30th, 2004, 09:18
The trade center was a finished issue, not an ongoing battle.

Piss poor on them for airing it now...disrespects those still with their lives on the line...I've never seen an Afgan tribute yet...o wait...Deomocrats can't bitch about what could be considered a republican success story...

Argue that...where the hell is Kopel and the dead americans in Afganistan...idiotic hipocritical bastard...cries that they did it for the towers..skip afganistan and O wait...lets do Iraq...lets see...we can blame 9/11 and Iraq deaths on Bush....but damnit...shutup about Afganistan...we might let a success story be heard...

So anyone still think it's not politically motivated...?

kinggovernor
April 30th, 2004, 11:25
The trade center was a finished issue, not an ongoing battle.

Piss poor on them for airing it now...disrespects those still with their lives on the line...I've never seen an Afgan tribute yet...o wait...Deomocrats can't bitch about what could be considered a republican success story...

Argue that...where the hell is Kopel and the dead americans in Afganistan...idiotic hipocritical bastard...cries that they did it for the towers..skip afganistan and O wait...lets do Iraq...lets see...we can blame 9/11 and Iraq deaths on Bush....but damnit...shutup about Afganistan...we might let a success story be heard...

So anyone still think it's not politically motivated...?

well i read they are only reading combat deaths, not friendly fires/accidental discharges etc.

i think they should read the names from afghanistan as well, they shouldn't be forgetten

Seawolf
April 30th, 2004, 11:50
i think they should read the names from afghanistan as well, they shouldn't be forgetten
reading names from afghanistan does not further the image that iraq is a massive quagmire, thus the names from afghanistan will not be read because it doesn't fit the agenda.

Dogg
April 30th, 2004, 14:41
well i read they are only reading combat deaths, not friendly fires/accidental discharges etc.

i think they should read the names from afghanistan as well, they shouldn't be forgetten


But again, as opposed to the trade center tribute as it was a finished event...why do a tribute to just those dead 'so far'? Is their intent to do these tributes after every 500 to make it seem worse or what? Again, they don't care about honoring america's dead soldiers because they ignored afgans thus far unless I am mistaken...

Both ABC and Sinclair's actions are politically motivated and having to resort to using my dead brothers in arms to make a stance in the public's eye is unacceptable...

kinggovernor
May 2nd, 2004, 20:23
But again, as opposed to the trade center tribute as it was a finished event...why do a tribute to just those dead 'so far'? Is their intent to do these tributes after every 500 to make it seem worse or what? Again, they don't care about honoring america's dead soldiers because they ignored afgans thus far unless I am mistaken...

Both ABC and Sinclair's actions are politically motivated and having to resort to using my dead brothers in arms to make a stance in the public's eye is unacceptable...

i too take great offense when people use the deaths of our dead brothers, however i dont forsee this as political motivated. if it turns out to be, i think the backlash would be so severe it would outweigh any political advantage they could gain.